Skip to Content Skip to Search U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Logo Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) Logo Intelligent Transportation Systems Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA)
 

 

Need assistance? Contact us or view the Help page.
Quick Links: Applications Overview icon Benefits Database icon Costs Database icon Deployment Statistics icon Lessons Learned icon
in   Search Help

 

Freeway Services Patrols: A State of the Practice


11-15 January 1998
California, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New York, Texas, Virginia, USA


Summary Information

Incident management programs with freeway service patrols have proven to be very successful at reducing incident detection time and duration. With a high benefit-to-cost ratio (ranging from 2:1 to 36.2:1), programs such as these are becoming more popular with the motoring public, politicians, and the agencies that support/operate them.

Results of Service Patrol Benefit-Cost Studies:

LOCATION
PATROL NAME
YEAR PERFORMED
B/C RATINGS
Charlotte, NCIncident Management Assistance Patrol
1993
3:1 to 7:1
Chicago, ILEmergency Traffic Patrol
1990
17:1
Dallas, TXCourtesy Patrol
1995
3.3:1 to 36.2:1
Denver, COMile High Courtesy Patrol
1996
20:1 to 23:1
Detroit, MIFreeway Courtesy Patrol
1995
14:1
Fresno, CAFreeway Service Patrol
1995
12.5:1
Houston, TXMotorist Assistance Program
1994
6.6:1 to 23.3:1
Los Angeles, CAMetro Freeway Service Patrol
1993
11:1
Minneapolis, MNHighway Helper
1995
5:1
New York & Westchester Co., NYHighway Emergency Local Patrol
1995
23.5:1
Norfolk, VASafety Service Patrol
1995
2:1 to 2.5:1
Oakland, CAFreeway Service Patrol
1991
3.5:1
Orange Co., CAFreeway Service Patrol
1995
3:1
Riverside Co., CAFreeway Service Patrol
1995
3:1
Sacramento, CAFreeway Service Patrol
1995
5.5:1

Comments   Post a Comment Post a Comment

No comments posted to date

Source

Freeway Services Patrols: A State of the Practice

Author: Fenno, David W. and Michael A. Ogden


Published By: Paper presented at the 77th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting. Washington, District of Columbia

Source Date: 11-15 January 1998


Goal Areas

Productivity

Typical Deployment Locations

Metropolitan Areas

Keywords

freeway service patrol, courtesy patrols, highway helpers, freeway service patrols

ID: 2000-00130